العودة

ألكسندر كالدر (1898-1976)

 
Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement. Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement. Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement. Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement. Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement. Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement. Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement. Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement. Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement. Alexander Calder executed a surprising number of oil paintings during the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. By this time, the shock of his 1930 visit to Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed not by the paintings but by the environment, had developed into an artistic language of Calder’s own. So, as Calder was painting The Cross in 1948, he was already on the cusp of international recognition and on his way to winning the XX VI Venice Biennale’s grand prize for sculpture in 1952. Working on his paintings in concert with his sculptural practice, Calder approached both mediums with the same formal language and mastery of shape and color.<br><br>Calder was deeply intrigued by the unseen forces that keep objects in motion. Taking this interest from sculpture to canvas, we see that Calder built a sense of torque within The Cross by shifting its planes and balance. Using these elements, he created implied motion suggesting that the figure is pressing forward or even descending from the skies above. The Cross’s determined momentum is further amplified by details such as the subject’s emphatically outstretched arms, the fist-like curlicue vector on the left, and the silhouetted serpentine figure.<br><br>Calder also adopts a strong thread of poetic abandon throughout The Cross’s surface. It resonates with his good friend Miró’s hieratic and distinctly personal visual language, but it is all Calder in the effective animation of this painting’s various elements. No artist has earned more poetic license than Calder, and throughout his career, the artist remained convivially flexible in his understanding of form and composition. He even welcomed the myriad interpretations of others, writing in 1951, “That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.”<br><br>Either way, it is important to remember that The Cross was painted shortly after the upheaval of the Second World War and to some appears to be a sobering reflection of the time. Most of all, The Cross proves that Alexander Calder loaded his brush first to work out ideas about form, structure, relationships in space, and most importantly, movement.
الصليب1948 28 3/4 × 36 1/4 بوصة. (73.03 × 92.08 سم) زيت على قماش
الاصل
معرض بيرلز، نيويورك
المجموعة الخاصة ، التي تم الحصول عليها من ما سبق
معرض
معرض كرين، لندن، كالدر: الزيوت والغواش والهواتف المحمولة والمنسوجات، 5 آذار/مارس - 1 أيار/مايو 1992
الاستفسار

"بالنسبة لي أهم شيء في التكوين هو التباين." - ألكسندر كالدر

التاريخ

نفذ ألكسندر كالدر عددا مذهلا من اللوحات الزيتية خلال النصف الثاني من 1940s وأوائل 1950s. بحلول هذا الوقت ، تطورت صدمة زيارته عام 1930 إلى استوديو موندريان ، حيث لم يكن معجبا باللوحات ولكن بالبيئة ، إلى لغة فنية خاصة بكالدر. لذلك ، بينما كان كالدر يرسم الصليب في عام 1948 ، كان بالفعل على أعتاب الاعتراف الدولي وفي طريقه للفوز بالجائزة الكبرى للنحت في بينالي البندقية السادس والعشرين في عام 1952. من خلال العمل على لوحاته بالتنسيق مع ممارسته النحتية ، اقترب كالدر من كلتا الوسيطتين بنفس اللغة الرسمية وإتقان الشكل واللون.

كان كالدر مفتونا بشدة بالقوى غير المرئية التي تحافظ على حركة الأشياء. بأخذ هذا الاهتمام من النحت إلى القماش ، نرى أن كالدر بنى إحساسا بعزم الدوران داخل The Cross من خلال تحويل طائراته وتوازنه. باستخدام هذه العناصر ، ابتكر حركة ضمنية تشير إلى أن الشكل يضغط للأمام أو حتى ينزل من السماء أعلاه. يتم تضخيم الزخم المصمم للصليب بشكل أكبر من خلال تفاصيل مثل أذرع الموضوع الممدودة بشكل قاطع ، وناقل curlicue الشبيه بالقبضة على اليسار ، والشكل السربنتين الظلي.

يتبنى كالدر أيضا خيطا قويا من التخلي الشعري في جميع أنحاء سطح الصليب. يتردد صداها مع اللغة البصرية الهيراطيقية والشخصية المميزة لصديقه العزيز ميرو ، لكنها كلها كالدر في الرسوم المتحركة الفعالة لعناصر هذه اللوحة المختلفة. لم يحصل أي فنان على رخصة شعرية أكثر من كالدر ، وطوال حياته المهنية ، ظل الفنان مرنا بشكل بهيج في فهمه للشكل والتكوين. حتى أنه رحب بالتفسيرات التي لا تعد ولا تحصى للآخرين ، حيث كتب في عام 1951 ، "أن يفهم الآخرون ما يدور في ذهني يبدو غير ضروري ، على الأقل طالما أن لديهم شيئا آخر في عقلهم".

في كلتا الحالتين ، من المهم أن نتذكر أن الصليب تم رسمه بعد فترة وجيزة من اضطرابات الحرب العالمية الثانية ويبدو للبعض أنه انعكاس واقعي للعصر. الأهم من ذلك كله ، يثبت الصليب أن ألكسندر كالدر قام بتحميل فرشاته أولا للعمل على أفكار حول الشكل والبنية والعلاقات في الفضاء ، والأهم من ذلك ، الحركة.

  • منحوتات من الجص ، استوديو روكسبري ، حوالي عام 1948

    منحوتات من الجص ، استوديو روكسبري ، حوالي عام 1948

    مؤسسة كالدر، نيويورك
  • كالدر مع جاكسون بولوك، إيست هامبتون، حوالي عام 1948

    تصوير مؤسسة هربرت ماتر © كالدر، نيويورك
  • كالدر، "الأذن الكبيرة"، 1943

    كالدر، "الأذن الكبيرة"، 1943

    تم تركيبه خارج الجناح الأمريكي في بينالي البندقية السادس والعشرين ، 1952
"لطالما اعتبر الإحساس بالحركة في الرسم والنحت أحد العناصر الأساسية للتكوين." - ألكسندر كالدر

رؤى السوق

  • Calder_AMR
  • كالدر منذ 2014 AMR
  • يظهر الرسم البياني الذي أجرته Art Market Research أنه منذ يناير 1976 ، زادت قيمة الأعمال الفنية لكالدر بنسبة 5068.8٪. خلال فترة السنوات الثماني نفسها ، كان معدل العائد السنوي لقطع كالدر 8.7٪.
  • في الرسم البياني الثاني ، نرى أن قيمة أعمال كالدر الفنية قد زادت بنسبة 66٪ منذ نوفمبر 2014 ، مما أدى إلى تحقيق معدل عائد سنوي قدره 6.3٪.
  • في حين أن كالدر كان فنانا غزير الإنتاج ، فإن اللوحات الزيتية على القماش مثل الصليب هي من بين أندر الأمثلة على عمل الفنان.

لوحات مماثلة تباع في مزاد علني

زيت على قماش، 48 × 45 بوصة. يباع في سوذبيز نيويورك: 11 نوفمبر 2014. © 2023 مؤسسة كالدر ، نيويورك / جمعية حقوق الفنانين (ARS) ، نيويورك

تم بيع فيلم "Personnage" (1946) مقابل 1,865,000 دولار أمريكي.

زيت على قماش، 48 × 45 بوصة. يباع في سوذبيز نيويورك: 11 نوفمبر 2014. © 2023 مؤسسة كالدر ، نيويورك / جمعية حقوق الفنانين (ARS) ، نيويورك
  • رسمت قبل عامين من الصليب
  • ألوان مماثلة ، لكن التجريد في The Cross أكثر ارتباطا
  • بيعت هذه اللوحة في مزاد علني في عام 2014 ، وستبلغ قيمتها أكثر من 3 ملايين دولار اليوم.
زيت على قماش، 48 × 60 بوصة. يباع في سوذبيز نيويورك: 14 نوفمبر 2018. © 2023 مؤسسة كالدر ، نيويورك / جمعية حقوق الفنانين (ARS) ، نيويورك

"Fond rouge" (1949) بيعت مقابل 1,815,000 دولار أمريكي.

زيت على قماش، 48 × 60 بوصة. يباع في سوذبيز نيويورك: 14 نوفمبر 2018. © 2023 مؤسسة كالدر ، نيويورك / جمعية حقوق الفنانين (ARS) ، نيويورك
  • رسمت بعد عام واحد فقط من الصليب
  • تجريد جميل ، ولكن ليس مثيرا من الناحية التركيبية مثل الصليب
  • الخلفية هنا هي لون واحد فقط ، في حين أن The Cross يوازن بين ألوان متعددة في خلفيته

لوحات مماثلة في مجموعات المتحف

معرض جامعة ييل للفنون

أدوات المساح (1955) ، زيت على قماش ، 24 × 18 بوصة. © 2023 مؤسسة كالدر ، نيويورك / جمعية حقوق الفنانين (ARS) ، نيويورك

متحف سان فرانسيسكو للفن الحديث

دوامة ومروحة (1956) ، زيت على قماش ، 17 7/8 × 26 1/8 بوصة. © 2023 مؤسسة كالدر ، نيويورك / جمعية حقوق الفنانين (ARS) ، نيويورك

المتحف الوطني للتعاون الفرنسي الأمريكي، بليرانكورت، فرنسا

بدون عنوان (1930) ، زيت على قماش ، 32 × 26 بوصة. © 2023 مؤسسة كالدر ، نيويورك / جمعية حقوق الفنانين (ARS) ، نيويورك
"إذا كنت تستطيع تخيل شيء ما ، واستحضره في الفضاء - ثم يمكنك صنعه ... الكون حقيقي ولكن لا يمكنك رؤيته. عليك أن تتخيل ذلك. بمجرد أن تتخيلها ، يمكنك أن تكون واقعيا بشأن إعادة إنتاجها." - ألكسندر كالدر

معرض الصور

موارد إضافية

معرض برج المعرض الوطني للفنون

شاهد أكبر عرض دائم في العالم لأعمال كالدر في المبنى الشرقي للمعرض الوطني للفنون.

كالدر حول العالم

استخدم الخريطة التفاعلية لمؤسسة كالدر لاستكشاف العالم من خلال فن كالدر.

أعمال كالدر

شاهد كالدر أثناء العمل في هذا الفيلم عام 1950 الذي أنتجته شركة New World Film Productions لمتحف الفن الحديث.

ألكسندر كالدر: الانسجام المتنافر

شاهد معرض SFMOMA لأعمال كالدر ، الذي سيتم عرضه حتى مايو 2023.
© 2023 مؤسسة كالدر ، نيويورك / جمعية حقوق الفنانين (ARS) ، نيويورك 

الاستفسار

الاستعلام - الفن واحد

أعمال أخرى لألكسندر كالدر

قد تحب أيضا