Pinturas de catedral de Alfred Sisley y Claude Monet

 

"Después de una mañana lluviosa, el día se volvió soleado, y fuimos a Moret... Vimos a Sisley". - Julie Manet, 1893
  • Puesto de Sisley1
    Claude Monet, Serie de la Catedral de Rouen
  • Vea el vídeo "time-lapse" del Museo Getty que sigue la progresión del sol a través de la serie de pinturas de Monet.

La serie de la Catedral de Rouen de Monet es uno de los logros más célebres de la historia del arte. Más de tres años después de su creación, a principios de febrero de 1892, veinte de los treinta lienzos de la Catedral de Monet se expusieron en la galería Durand-Ruel, y la muestra fue considerada un triunfo por los asistentes en mayo de 1895. Entre los pintores, Camille Pissarro escribió que "se dejó llevar por su extraordinaria destreza". Cezanne, a quien [Pissarro] conoció ayer en casa de Durand-Ruel, está totalmente de acuerdo... es la obra de un artista equilibrado pero impulsivo que persigue los matices intangibles de los efectos que ningún otro pintor ha realizado". (Camille Pissarro a su hijo Lucien, 26 de mayo de 1895)

Sin embargo, Monet no estaba tan seguro de sí mismo cuando prosiguió su empeño en abril de 1892. Conocido por sus habituales cambios de humor, Monet regresó a Giverny con la primera tanda de lienzos de la Catedral y le preocupaba que llevar la luz y su efecto sobre la forma más allá de lo que había calculado anteriormente pudiera ser una exageración. Sin embargo, cuando desveló los cuadros a los visitantes, la respuesta de éstos fue de asombro, y la confianza de Monet creció. Los efusivos elogios del pintor estadounidense Theodore Robinson coincidieron con la reacción de asombro que otros experimentaron al ver estas obras maestras: "Son simplemente colosales. Creo que nunca antes se había pintado una arquitectura así, la más asombrosa impresión de la cosa, una sensación de grandeza y decadencia... ni una línea en ninguna parte, y sin embargo hay una maravillosa sensación de construcción y solidez. ¿No es curioso que un hombre tome tal material y haga un uso tan magnífico de él?" (Robinson a J. Alden Weir, mayo de 1892)

¿Podría Alfred Sisley haber estado entre los primeros respondedores de la Catedral? Sin duda. Monet y él eran los mejores amigos. Aunque Sisley era un hombre reservado y tranquilo que dejaba pocas migajas biográficas, también era un recurso de gran confianza y un artista al que Monet respetaba mucho. De hecho, los relatos de primera mano de los compañeros de Sisley y Monet confirman el vínculo entre las dos series. Una anotación del 21 de septiembre de 1893 en el diario de Julie Manet (la entonces adolescente hija de Berthe Morisot y del hermano de Edouard Manet, Eugéne) señala que "después de una mañana lluviosa, el día se volvió soleado, y nos dirigimos a Moret... Vimos a Sisley". Su hijo, el historiador de arte Denis Rouart, confirmó la anotación, afirmando además que "Berthe y su hija... fueron con los Mallarmé a Moret, donde Sisley estaba pintando una serie de iglesias - inspiradas, o eso pensaba Mallarmé, en la serie de Catedrales de Monet". (Denis Rouart, París, 1950)

  • Puesto de trabajo de Sisley2
    (desde la izquierda): Claude Monet (1887) / Alfred Sisley (1863)
  • Sisley-post3
    (desde la izquierda): Moret sur Loing, La rue de l'Eglise (tarjeta postal de época) / Moret sur Loing, l'eglise Norte-Dame (tarjeta postal de época)
  • Puesto de Sisley4
    (desde la izquierda): Alfred Sisley, "L'Église de Moret, le Soir, (La iglesia de Moret, la tarde)", antiguo sobre lienzo / Foto actual de la Eglise Notre-Damer de la Nativite, Moret-sur-Loing

Alfred Sisley se instaló en Moret-sur-Loing en noviembre de 1889, un pueblo de encanto inigualable situado entre île-de-France y Borgoña, al borde del bosque de Fontainebleau. Entre sus rasgos más atractivos se encuentra la imponente iglesia de Norte-Dame, de estilo gótico, que domina el horizonte desde el río. Desde el modesto jardín de Sisley, la torre de la iglesia era un elemento omnipresente en el horizonte.

A diferencia de Monet, cuyas treinta vistas del pórtico de la catedral de Rouen, en el lado oeste, fueron ejecutadas exclusivamente como un examen del juego de luces y sombras a través de la fachada del edificio, Sisley trató de afirmar la naturaleza permanente de la iglesia bajo los cambios variables de luz y de atmósfera capturados en sus pinturas. De los impresionistas, fue el que más se dedicó a trabajar al aire libre sin retirarse a un estudio para realizar modificaciones o retoques. El tranquilo y reservado Sisley trabajó en sus Catedrales como siempre lo había hecho, alla prima y exclusivamente en plein air para mostrar la apariencia cambiante de un motivo a través de una serie de cambios atmosféricos. El hecho de que titulase las obras como "Bajo el sol", "Bajo la escarcha" y "Bajo la lluvia" y las expusiese en grupo en el Salon du Champ-de-Mars de 1894 sugiere que también las consideraba interpretaciones en serie.

Sisley fue citado a menudo por su gentil integridad y su capacidad para dar veracidad a la atmósfera y al tono, pero también era capaz de producir composiciones poderosamente estructuradas y sobresalía en la representación de escenas desde ángulos inusuales que daban energía a sus composiciones. No es de extrañar que L'Église de Moret, le Soir sea un excelente ejemplo de cómo Sisley sacaba partido a su caballete. Su línea de visión está ligeramente inclinada hacia arriba, pero decididamente dirigida a la esquina del pórtico suroeste. Esta característica columnaria agrupada acentúa el empuje imponente y ascendente del motivo de la iglesia. Pero el verdadero arte aquí es que funciona como el centro desde el que dos fuerzas tensionales se alejan la una de la otra y, sorprendentemente, con una fuerza proporcional. La brillantez de este cuadro es el efecto dramático de una perspectiva en picado creada por la estrecha calle (rue de l'Église) de la izquierda y la oposición blanqueada es proporciona una estructura de piedra de peso y masa inimaginables; ambos son aspectos planos que demuestran maravillosamente perspectivas decrecientes de tres puntos perfectamente dibujadas.

De la docena de óleos conocidos que Sisley pintó de la iglesia de Moret, L'Église de Moret, le Soir no sólo tiene un tamaño generoso, sino que se encuentra entre los cuadros más grandes de toda su obra. La escala de esta obra demuestra la determinación de Sisley de crear un homenaje que respete plenamente a los arquitectos y constructores de una estructura tan inexpugnable y resuelta, que se mantenía en pie igual cuando Sisley la pintó que en la época medieval, y que se mantiene para nosotros hoy, como perdurará en el tiempo. 

Preguntar

Detalle de Arte

Atrás

ALFRED SISLEY (1839-1899)

 
Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight.
L'Église de Moret, le Soir189431 1/4 x 39 1/2 in.(81,28 x 100,33 cm) lienzo al óleo
Procedencia
Finca de Sisley
Venta: Vente de l'Atelier Sisley, Galeries Georges Petit Paris, 1 de mayo de 1899, lote 13
George Viau, París
Venta: Hôtel Drouot París, 20 de febrero de 1908, lote 37
Colección Pearson, París (adquirida en la venta anterior)
Venta: Vente Pearson, Galerie Paul Cassirer Berlín, 18 de octubre de 1927, lote 65
Colección privada
Venta: Hôtel Drouot, París, 23 de junio de 1928, lote 98
Colección Aubert, París (adquirida en la venta anterior; posiblemente Marcel Aubert)
Colección privada Galería Edward Nahem
S
...Más....teven Bedowitz, Boca Ratón, Florida (adquirida en 1989)
Private Collection, Nueva York
Larry Lacerte, Dallas (adquirido en 1991)
Colección privada (adquirida en 1996)
Exposición
Tokio, Museo de Arte Isetan; Kagawa, Museo Municipal de Arte Takamatsu; Hiroshima, Museo de Arte y Wakayama, Museo Departamental de Arte Moderno, Exposición Alfred Sisley, 2000, no. 53, ilustrado en color pp. 138-139
Literatura
O. Reuterswaerd, "Sisley's Cathedrals, A Study of the Church at Moret" en Gazette des Beaux Arts, marzo de 1952, fig. 1, ilustrada en la p. 194
F. Daulte, Alfred Sisley. Catalogue raisonné de l'œuvre peint, Lausana, 1959, nº 835, ilustrado en blanco y negro
F. Daulte, Sisley. Les Saisons, París, 1992, no. 41, ilustrado en color p. 73
R. Shone, Sisley, Nueva York, 1992, pl. 134, ilustrado en color p. 170 (mencionado pp. 164-165)
Brame, S., Sisley, A., Lorenceau, F., & Daulte, O. (2021). Alfred Sisley: Catalogue critique des peintures et des pastels. P. 347 ill. 347, 501
...MENOS....
Entre Île-de-France y Borgoña, al borde del bosque de Fontainebleau, se encuentra el pueblo medieval de Moret-sur-Loing, fundado en el siglo XII. Cuando Alfred Sisley describió su carácter a Monet en una carta fechada el 31 de agosto de 1881 como "un paisaje de bombonera...", lo hizo como un recuerdo de seducción; que su torre del homenaje, las murallas, la iglesia, las puertas fortificadas y las fachadas ornamentadas enclavadas a lo largo del río constituían, para un pintor, un marco de encanto incomparable. Una antigua iglesia, siempre el elemento urbano más llamativo del valle del Sena, estará presente en las vistas urbanas de Sisley, como lo estuvo para Corot y para Monet en Vétheuil. Pero, a diferencia de Monet, cuyas treinta vistas de la catedral de Ruán fueron realizadas para trazar el juego de luces y sombras a través de la fachada de la catedral y captar la naturaleza efímera de los cambios de luz y de atmósfera de un momento a otro, Sisley se propuso afirmar la naturaleza permanente de la iglesia de Notre-Dame en Moret-sur-Loing. La única preocupación de Monet era el aire y la luz, y la de Sisley parece ser un recuerdo homenaje. El cuadro destila respeto por los arquitectos y constructores originales de una estructura tan inexpugnable y resuelta, que se mantuvo en pie entonces como en aquellos tiempos medievales, y que para nosotros, se mantiene en pie hoy, como lo hará, por tiempo inmemorial.

No obstante, Sisley se esforzó por mostrar la apariencia cambiante del motivo a través de una serie de cambios atmosféricos. Tituló las obras "Bajo el sol", "Bajo la escarcha" y "Bajo la lluvia", y las expuso en grupo en el Salon du Champ-de-Mars de 1894, lo que sugiere que las consideraba interpretaciones en serie. Sin embargo, a diferencia de la obra de Monet, l'église de Moret, le Soir revela que Sisley optó por exponer el motivo en un contexto espacial que acentúa sus atributos compositivos: la perspectiva en picado de la estrecha calle de la izquierda, el fuerte retroceso diagonal de las líneas del edificio como contrapeso a la derecha y el imponente peso del edificio pétreo sobre la línea de visión.
Preguntar

Lecturas adicionales