戻る

ルフィーノ・タマヨ (1899-1991)

 
<div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div>
ナチュラレサ・ムエルタ193529 1/4 x 58 3/4 インチ(74.3 x 149.23 cm)キャンバスに油彩
出所
エドワード・チョドロフのコレクション、ビバリーヒルズ
ファニー・ブライス嬢のコレクション(ロサンゼルス
メアリー・アン・マーティン/ファインアート(ニューヨーク
展示会
名古屋、名古屋市美術館「ルフィノ・タマヨ回顧展」、1993年10月~12月12日
メキシコシティ、メキシコ、テレビサ文化財団&現代文化センター、「ルフィノ・タマヨ展 1920-1950年」、1996年10月19日-2月25日
カリフォルニア州サンタバーバラ、サンタバーバラ美術館、「タマヨ:再解釈された現代のアイコン」、2月17日~5月27日
...もっとその。。。 2007
文学
今日、ルフィノ・タマヨのパサージュ・アメリカ博覧会が開催される」『エル・ユニバーサル』1935年11月号(イラスト入り)
ロバート・ゴールドウォーター、『ルフィノ・タマヨ』ニューヨーク市、1947年、XVI頁(図版56頁)
フスティーノ・フェルナンデス、ルフィーノ・タマヨ、メキシコ・シティ、メキシコ、1948年
Ceferino Palencia, Rufino Tayamo, Mexico City, Mexico, 1950, no.4(図版)
名古屋市美術館『ルフィノ・タマヨ回顧展』名古屋、1993年、No.17、p.34(カラー図版)
フンダシオン・カルチュラル・テレビサ&セントロ・カルチュラル・アート・コンテンポラネオ、ルフィノ・タマヨ:デル・リフレホ・アル・スエーニョ1920-1950、メキシコ・シティ、メキシコ、1995年、No.56, p. 46 (カラー図版)
Octavio Paz, Transfiguraciones en Historia del Arte de Oaxaca, Mexico City, Mexico, 1998, no.5, p. 16-17 (カラー図版)
オクタビオ・パス、ルフィノ・タマヨ、メキシコ・シティ、メキシコ、2003年、No.5 (カラー図版)
ダイアナ・C.DuPont, Juan Carlos Pereda, et al., Tamayo; A Modern Icon Reinterpreted, Santa Barbara, CA, 2007, pl. 43, p. 162 (illustrated in color)
...少ない。。。 価格1,850,000
お 問い合わせ

歴史

1920年代半ば、ルフィノ・タマヨは洗練された現代的な色彩画家として重要な発展段階に入った。ニューヨークでピカソ、ブラック、ジョルジョ・デ・キリコの画期的な作品に出会い、キュビスムの不朽の影響も受けた。街角の風景、大衆文化、日常生活から得た題材を通して、絵画的、造形的な価値を探求し、色彩と形態に対する彼独自のアプローチが形づくられ始めた。それはコスモポリタンな美学への極めて重要な転換であり、メキシコ壁画運動の政治的な物語に代表される民族主義的熱狂とは一線を画すものだった。大衆文化の活力に焦点を当てることで、彼はメキシコの本質的なアイデンティティを捉え、明確な社会的・政治的コメントよりも普遍的な芸術的価値を優先させた。このアプローチは、世界的な舞台でメキシコ美術を再定義するという彼のコミットメントを強調し、モダニズム対話への彼の革新的な貢献を浮き彫りにした。

セザンヌのように、タマヨは静物画というジャンルを最も美しくシンプルな表現へと昇華させた。しかし、メキシコの生き生きとしたモチーフとパリ派のアヴァンギャルドな影響を容易に融合させる高度な洗練が、タマヨの根底にある。1935年の「ナトゥラレサ・ムエルタ」で明らかになったように、タマヨは、彼の作品が比較の対象とされるパリ派の現代美術を特徴づける、単なる装飾に陥ることを拒んだ。その代わりに、スイカ、ボトル、コーヒーポット、その他さまざまな品々を、地味で地縛的な色調と不確定で浅い空間の中に配置することで、タマヨのシュルレアリスムへの初期の関心を思い起こさせる。重ねられた正方形のマトリックスは、絵画の有機的な主題と、それらに課せられた抽象的で知的な構造との対比を強調し、作家の視覚的知覚と表象の探求の解釈を深めている。このように、グリッドは目に見える世界と、それを理解するための根底にある構造との間を行き来する役割を果たし、現実と抽象、感覚と分析の相互作用について考えるよう鑑賞者を誘う。

  • ルフィーノとオルガ・タマヨ、1949年のパブロ=ピカソ一家
    1949年、ルフィーノとオルガ・タマヨとパブロ・ピカソとその家族
  • タマヨ-1968---写真-アルマンド-エレラ
    ルフィノ・タマヨと "サンディアス "1968年 - Photo:アルマンド・エレーラ

重要事項

  • 大衆文化の活力に焦点を当てることで、ルフィノ・タマヨはメキシコの本質的なアイデンティティを捉え、露骨な社会的・政治的コメントよりも普遍的な芸術的価値を優先させた。このアプローチは、世界的な舞台でメキシコ美術を再定義するという彼のコミットメントを強調し、モダニズム対話への彼の革新的な貢献を浮き彫りにした。
  • セザンヌのように、タマヨは静物画というジャンルを最も美しくシンプルな表現へと昇華させた。しかし、メキシコの生き生きとしたモチーフとパリ派のアヴァンギャルドな影響を見事に融合させたタマヨの作品には、高い洗練性がある。
  • 1935年の「ナトゥラレサ・ムエルタ」で明らかになったように、タマヨは、彼の作品が比較の対象とされる現代パリ派の特徴である単なる装飾に陥ることを拒んだ。その代わりに、スイカ、ボトル、コーヒーポット、雑貨などを、地味で落ち着いた色調と不確定で浅い空間の中に配置することで、タマヨのシュルレアリスムへの初期の関心を思い起こさせる。
"芸術とは、あらゆる場所で、あらゆる人に理解されなければならない表現手段である。それは大地、私たちの生活の質感、そして私たちの経験から育まれる。"- ルフィノ・タマヨ

マーケットインサイト

  • スクリーンショット
    ロンドンを拠点とするアート・マーケット・リサーチによると、タマヨの市場価格は1976年以来、年平均成長率7.5%で上昇している。
  • この絵は9冊の本に出版され、3つの美術館で展示された。
  • タマヨの作品10点がオークションで300万ドルの大台を超えたが(下記参照)、そのうちの2点はスイカ(「サンディアス」)を題材にしたものだった。
  • ロンドンを拠点とするアート・マーケット・リサーチによると、タマヨの市場価格は1976年以来、年平均7.5%の成長を遂げている(AMRのグラフ参照)。
  • タマヨの絵画10点がオークションで300万ドル以上の値をつけた。 
  • 複数のトップセールスは、スイカをスライスした絵である。

オークションでの上位成績

「トロバドール」(1945年)油彩・カンヴァス 60 3/8 x 50 in.サザビーズ・ニューヨークで落札:2008年5月、5,873,000ドルで落札。
「アメリカ」(1955年頃)、油彩、キャンバス、13フィート2インチ×45フィート10 3/8インチ。サザビーズ・ニューヨークにて落札:2008年11月、6,802,500ドルで落札。
「Perro aullando a la Luna"(1942年)、油彩・カンヴァス、44 1/4×33.3/4インチ。 サザビーズ・ニューヨークで落札:2008年5月、5,873,000ドルで落札。

オークションで落札された類似の絵画

「サンディアス」(1980年)、油彩、キャンバス、49×71インチ。ニューヨークのサザビーズにて2019年5月14日、4,933,900ドルで落札。
  • 我々の仕事よりずっと後の例
  • 私たちの絵画に匹敵するスタイル
  • 私たちの絵と同じ題材
「El Comedor de sandías" (1949) 油彩・カンヴァス 39 x 32インチ 2008年5月29日、ニューヨークのサザビーズにて$3,625,000で落札。
  • 私たちの仕事と比較可能な期間
  • 私たちの絵画に匹敵するスタイル
  • 私たちの絵と同じ題材
"Sandías y Naranja" (1957) 油彩・カンヴァス 40 x 32インチ サザビーズ・ニューヨークにて2016年11月22日、229万2500ドルで落札。
  • 我々の例よりはるかに小さい
  • 芸術家にとってずっと後期の時代
  • 私たちの絵と同じ題材

美術館所蔵の絵画

「テワンテペックの女たち」(1938年)油彩、キャンバス、36×28インチ、ニューヨーク近代美術館蔵
「灰色の服の女(1959年)、油彩、キャンバス、76 x 51インチ、グッゲンハイム美術館、ニューヨーク
「パイナップルを持つ女」(1941年、油彩、キャンバス、40×30インチ、ニューヨーク近代美術館蔵
「白い果実の鉢」(1938年)油彩、キャンバス、7.7/8×23.5/8インチ、ニューヨーク近代美術館蔵 © 2024 アーティスト・ライツ・ソサエティ(ARS)、ニューヨーク
「芸術の基本は自由なのに、私たちの道だけが唯一の道だと言うなんて、信じられる?芸術には何百万もの道がある。アーティストの数だけ道があるのだ"- ルフィノ・タマヨ

追加リソース

ルフィノ・タマヨ BY グレゴリオ・ルーク

グレゴリオ・ルカが、メキシコの色彩の巨匠ルフィノ・タマヨと、精神的な活動としての絵画への激しいこだわりについて語る。

ルフィノ・タマヨ-その芸術の源泉

タマヨの人生と経験そのものを洞察する。

素材と記憶:ミクソグラフィアとタマヨ

ルフィノ・タマヨと画期的なミクソグラフィアの版画技法についての特別対談をZoomでご覧ください。

お 問い合わせ

お問い合わせ - アートシングル

こちらもご覧ください