Atrás

RUFINO TAMAYO (1899-1991)

 
<div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div> <div>In the mid-1920s, Rufino Tamayo embarked on the crucial development phase as a sophisticated, contemporary colorist. In New York, he encountered the groundbreaking works of Picasso, Braque, and Giorgio de Chirico, along with the enduring impact of Cubism. Exploring painterly and plastic values through subjects sourced from street scenes, popular culture, and the fabric of daily life, his unique approach to color and form began to take shape. It was a pivotal shift toward cosmopolitan aesthetics, setting him apart from the nationalist fervor championed by the politically charged narratives of the Mexican Muralist movement.  By focusing on the vitality of popular culture, he captured the essential Mexican identity that prioritized universal artistic values over explicit social and political commentary. The approach underscored his commitment to redefining Mexican art on the global stage and highlighted his innovative contributions to the modernist dialogue. </div><br><br><div> </div><br><br><div>Like Cézanne, Tamayo elevated the still life genre to some of its most beautifully simple expressions. Yet high sophistication underlies the ease with which Tamayo melds vibrant Mexican motifs with the avant-garde influences of the School of Paris. As "Naturaleza Muerta" of 1935 reveals, Tamayo refused to lapse into the mere decoration that often characterizes the contemporary School of Paris art with which his work draws comparisons. Instead, his arrangement of watermelons, bottles, a coffee pot, and sundry items staged within a sobering, earthbound tonality and indeterminant, shallow space recalls Tamayo's early interest in Surrealism. An overlayed square matrix underscores the contrast between the organic subjects of the painting and the abstract, intellectualized structure imposed upon them, deepening the interpretation of the artist's exploration of visual perception and representation. In this way, the grid serves to navigate between the visible world and the underlying structures that inform our understanding of it, inviting viewers to consider the interplay between reality and abstraction, sensation and analysis.</div>
Naturaleza Muerta193529 1/4 x 58 3/4 pulg.(74,3 x 149,23 cm) óleo sobre lienzo
Procedencia
Colección de Edward Chodorov, Beverly Hills, California
Colección de Miss Fanny Brice, Los Ángeles, California
Mary-Anne Martin | Fine Art, Nueva York
Colección privada
Colección privada, por descendencia
Exposición
Nagoya, Japón, Museo de Arte de la Ciudad de Nagoya, "Retrospectiva de Rufino Tamayo", octubre - 12 de diciembre de 1993.
Ciudad de México, México, Fundación Cultural Televisa & Centro Cultural Arte Contemporáneo, "Rufino Tamayo del Reflejo al Sueño 1920 -1950," 19 de octubre - 25 de febrero de 1996
Santa Bárbara, California, San
...Más....Museo de Arte de Ta Bárbara, "Tamayo: un icono moderno reinterpretado", del 17 de febrero al 27 de mayo de 2007.
Literatura
"Hoy se inaugura la exposición de Rufino Tamayo en el Pasaje América", El Universal, noviembre de 1935 (ilustrado).
Robert Goldwater, Rufino Tamayo, Nueva York, NY, 1947, p. XVI (ilustrado p. 56)
Justino Fernández, Rufino Tamayo, Ciudad de México, México, 1948
Ceferino Palencia, Rufino Tayamo, Ciudad de México, México, 1950, no. 4 (ilustrado)
Museo de Arte de la Ciudad de Nagoya, Retrospectiva de Rufino Tamayo, Nagoya, Japón, 1993, nº 17, p. 34 (ilustrado en color)
Fundación Cultural Televisa & Centro Cultural Arte Contemporáneo, Rufino Tamayo: del Reflejo al Sueño 1920 - 1950, Ciudad de México, México, 1995, no. 56, p. 46 (ilustrado en color)
Octavio Paz, Transfiguraciones en Historia del Arte de Oaxaca, Ciudad de México, México, 1998, no. 5, p. 16-17 (ilustrado en color)
Octavio Paz, Rufino Tamayo, Ciudad de México, México, 2003, no. 5 (ilustrado en color)
Diana C. DuPont, Juan Carlos Pereda, et. al., Tamayo; A Modern Icon Reinterpreted, Santa Barbara, CA, 2007, pl. 43, p. 162 (ilustrado en color)
...MENOS.... Precio1,850,000
Preguntar

Historia

A mediados de la década de 1920, Rufino Tamayo se embarcó en la fase crucial de su desarrollo como colorista sofisticado y contemporáneo. En Nueva York conoció la obra innovadora de Picasso, Braque y Giorgio de Chirico, así como el impacto perdurable del cubismo. Explorando los valores pictóricos y plásticos a través de temas procedentes de escenas callejeras, la cultura popular y el tejido de la vida cotidiana, comenzó a tomar forma su enfoque único del color y la forma. Fue un cambio fundamental hacia una estética cosmopolita, que le apartó del fervor nacionalista defendido por las narrativas políticamente cargadas del movimiento muralista mexicano. Al centrarse en la vitalidad de la cultura popular, captó la identidad mexicana esencial que priorizaba los valores artísticos universales sobre el comentario social y político explícito. Este enfoque subrayó su compromiso con la redefinición del arte mexicano en la escena mundial y puso de relieve sus innovadoras aportaciones al diálogo modernista.

Al igual que Cézanne, Tamayo elevó el género de la naturaleza muerta a algunas de sus expresiones más hermosamente sencillas. Sin embargo, la gran sofisticación subyace en la facilidad con la que Tamayo fusiona los vibrantes motivos mexicanos con las influencias vanguardistas de la Escuela de París. Como revela Naturaleza Muerta, de 1935, Tamayo se negó a caer en la mera decoración que a menudo caracteriza al arte contemporáneo de la Escuela de París, con la que su obra se compara. En cambio, la disposición de sandías, botellas, una cafetera y otros objetos en una tonalidad aleccionadora y terrenal, y un espacio indeterminado y poco profundo, recuerdan el temprano interés de Tamayo por el surrealismo. Una matriz cuadrada superpuesta subraya el contraste entre los temas orgánicos de la pintura y la estructura abstracta e intelectualizada que se les impone, profundizando la interpretación de la exploración del artista de la percepción visual y la representación. De este modo, la cuadrícula sirve para navegar entre el mundo visible y las estructuras subyacentes que informan nuestra comprensión del mismo, invitando al espectador a considerar la interacción entre realidad y abstracción, sensación y análisis.

  • Rufino-y-Olga-Tamayo,-Pablo-Picasso-y-familia-en-1949
    Rufino y Olga Tamayo con Pablo Picasso y familia en 1949
  • Tamayo-1968---Foto-Armando-Herrera
    Rufino Tamayo con "Sandias" 1968 - Foto: Armando Herrera

DATOS IMPORTANTES

  • Al centrarse en la vitalidad de la cultura popular, Rufino Tamayo captó la identidad mexicana esencial que priorizaba los valores artísticos universales sobre el comentario social y político explícito. Este enfoque subrayó su compromiso con la redefinición del arte mexicano en la escena mundial y puso de relieve sus innovadoras aportaciones al diálogo modernista.
  • Al igual que Cézanne, Tamayo elevó el género de la naturaleza muerta a algunas de sus expresiones más hermosamente sencillas. Sin embargo, la gran sofisticación subyace en la facilidad con la que Tamayo fusiona los vibrantes motivos mexicanos con las influencias vanguardistas de la Escuela de París.
  • Como revela Naturaleza Muerta, de 1935, Tamayo se negó a caer en la mera decoración que a menudo caracteriza a la escuela contemporánea del arte parisino con la que su obra se compara. En cambio, la disposición de sandías, botellas, una cafetera y otros objetos en una tonalidad aleccionadora y terrenal y en un espacio indeterminado y poco profundo recuerda el temprano interés de Tamayo por el surrealismo.
"El arte es un medio de expresión que debe ser comprendido por todos, en todas partes. Crece de la tierra, de las texturas de nuestras vidas y de nuestra experiencia". - Rufino Tamayo

CONOCIMIENTOS DEL MERCADO

  • Captura de pantalla
    Según Art Market Research, con sede en Londres, los precios de mercado de Tamayo han aumentado a una tasa compuesta de crecimiento anual del 7,5% desde 1976.
  • Este cuadro se ha publicado en 9 libros y se ha expuesto en 3 museos.
  • 10 obras de Tamayo han superado la barrera de los 3 millones de dólares en subasta (ver abajo) y 2 de ellas eran de sandías.
  • Según Art Market Research, con sede en Londres, los precios de mercado de Tamayo han experimentado una tasa compuesta de crecimiento anual de 7.5% desde 1976 (ver gráfica de AMR).
  • Diez cuadros de Tamayo han superado los 3 millones de dólares en subasta. 
  • Varias de las ventas más importantes han sido de cuadros con rodajas de sandía.

Los mejores resultados en las subastas

"Trovador" (1945), óleo sobre lienzo, 60 3/8 x 50 pulg. Vendido en Sotheby's Nueva York: Mayo de 2008 por 5.873.000 dólares.
"América" (c. 1955), óleo sobre lienzo, 13 pies 2 pulgadas por 45 pies 10 3/8 pulgadas. Vendido en Sotheby's Nueva York: noviembre de 2008 por 6.802.500 dólares.
"Perro aullando a la Luna" (1942), óleo sobre lienzo, 44 1/4 por 33 3/4 pulg. Vendido en Sotheby's Nueva York: Mayo de 2008 por 5.873.000 dólares.

Pinturas comparables vendidas en subastas

"Sandías" (1980), óleo sobre lienzo, 49 x 71 pulg. Vendido en Sotheby's, Nueva York: 14 de mayo de 2019 por 4.933.900 $.
  • Ejemplo muy posterior a nuestro trabajo
  • Estilo comparable a nuestro cuadro
  • El mismo tema que nuestro cuadro
"El Comedor de sandías" (1949), óleo sobre lienzo, 39 x 32 pulg. Vendido en Sotheby's, Nueva York: 29 de mayo de 2008 por 3.625.000 $.
  • Período comparable a nuestro trabajo
  • Estilo comparable a nuestro cuadro
  • El mismo tema que nuestro cuadro
"Sandías y Naranja" (1957), óleo sobre lienzo, 40 x 32 pulg Vendido en Sotheby's Nueva York: 22 de noviembre de 2016 por 2.292.500 $.
  • Mucho más pequeño que nuestro ejemplo
  • Período muy posterior para el artista
  • El mismo tema que nuestro cuadro

Pinturas en colecciones de museos

"Mujeres de Tehuantepec" (1938), óleo sobre lienzo, 36 x 28 pulg., Museo de Arte Moderno, Nueva York
"Mujer de gris" (1959), óleo sobre lienzo, 76 x 51 pulg., Museo Guggenheim, Nueva York
"Mujer con piña" (1941), óleo sobre lienzo, 40 x 30 pulg., Museo de Arte Moderno, Nueva York
"El frutero blanco" (1938), óleo sobre lienzo, 7 7/8 × 23 5/8 pulg., Museo de Arte Moderno, Nueva York 2024 Sociedad para los Derechos de los Artistas (ARS), Nueva York
"¡Puedes creerlo, decir que el nuestro es el único camino cuando lo fundamental en el arte es la libertad! En el arte hay millones de caminos; tantos caminos como artistas". - Rufino Tamayo

Recursos adicionales

RUFINO TAMAYO POR GREGORIO LUKE

Gregorio Luke habla de Rufino Tamayo, el maestro mexicano del color, y de su feroz compromiso con la pintura como actividad espiritual.

RUFINO TAMAYO - LAS FUENTES DE SU ARTE

Dando a conocer los elementos de la propia vida y experiencia de Tamayo.

MATERIALES Y MEMORIAS: MIXOGRAFIA Y TAMAYO

Vea esta conversación especial a través de Zoom sobre Rufino Tamayo y la innovadora técnica de grabado Mixografía.

Preguntar

Consulta - Arte individual

También le puede gustar