لوحات كاتدرائية ألفريد سيسلي وكلود مونيه

مايو 2022
التعليم

 

"بعد صباح ممطر ، تحول اليوم إلى يوم مشمس ، وخرجنا إلى موريت ... رأينا سيسلي." - جولي مانيه ، 1893
  • سيسلي بوست1
    كلود مونيه، سلسلة كاتدرائية روان
  • مونيه الفاصل الزمني
    شاهد فيديو "الفاصل الزمني" لمتحف جيتي الذي يتتبع تقدم الشمس من خلال سلسلة لوحات مونيه.

تعد سلسلة كاتدرائية روان من مونيه من بين الإنجازات الأكثر شهرة في تاريخ الفن. بعد أكثر من ثلاث سنوات من إنشائه في أوائل فبراير 1892 ، تم عرض عشرين من لوحات كاتدرائية مونيه الثلاثين في معرض دوراند رويل ، واعتبر المعرض بأغلبية ساحقة انتصارا من قبل أولئك الذين حضروا في مايو من عام 1895. من بين الرسامين ، كتب كاميل بيسارو كيف أنه "تم حمله بعيدا عن براعتهم غير العادية. سيزان، الذي التقى به [بيسارو] أمس في دوراند رويل، متفق تماما ... هذا هو عمل فنان متوازن ولكنه متهور يسعى وراء الفروق الدقيقة غير الملموسة للتأثيرات التي يحققها أي رسام آخر. " (كاميل بيسارو لابنه لوسيان، 26 مايو 1895)

ومع ذلك ، لم يكن مونيه واثقا جدا عند متابعة المسعى في أبريل 1892. عاد مونيه ، المعروف بتقلبات المزاج المعتادة ، إلى جيفرني مع الدفعة الأولى من لوحات الكاتدرائية وكان قلقا من أن دفع الضوء وتأثيره على الشكل بما يتجاوز جميع الحسابات السابقة قد يكون تجاوزا مفرطا. ولكن عندما كشف النقاب عن اللوحات للزوار ، كان ردهم مذهلا ، ونمت ثقة مونيه. تطابق ثناء الرسام الأمريكي ثيودور روبنسون الصاخب مع رد الفعل المذهل الذي عاشه الآخرون عند رؤية هذه الروائع: "إنها ببساطة هائلة. أعتقد أنه لم يتم رسم الهندسة المعمارية على هذا النحو من قبل ، والانطباع الأكثر إثارة للدهشة عن الشيء ، والشعور بالعظمة والاضمحلال ... ليس خطا في أي مكان - ومع ذلك هناك شعور رائع بالبناء والصلابة. أليس من الغريب أن يأخذ رجل مثل هذه المواد ويستخدمها بشكل رائع؟" (روبنسون إلى ج. ألدن وير ، مايو 1892)

هل يمكن أن يكون ألفريد سيسلي من بين أوائل المستجيبين للكاتدرائية ؟ التاكيد. مونيه وكان هو أقرب الأصدقاء. في حين كان سيسلي رجلا خاصا وهادئا ترك القليل من فتات الخبز في السيرة الذاتية ، إلا أنه كان أيضا موردا موثوقا به للغاية وفنانا يحظى باحترام مونيه بقوة. في الواقع ، تؤكد الروايات المباشرة لمجموعات سيسلي ومونيه العلاقة بين السلسلتين. يشير مدخل 21 سبتمبر 1893 في مذكرات جولي مانيه (الابنة المراهقة آنذاك لبيرث موريسوت وشقيق إدوارد مانيه أوجين) إلى أنه "بعد صباح ممطر ، تحول اليوم إلى مشمس ، وخرجنا إلى موريت ... رأينا سيسلي". وأكد ابنها، مؤرخ الفن دينيس روارت هذا الإدخال، مشيرا كذلك إلى أن "بيرث وابنتها... ذهب مع مالارميز إلى موريت حيث كان سيسلي يرسم سلسلة من الكنائس - مستوحاة ، أو هكذا اعتقد مالارميه من سلسلة مونيه من الكاتدرائيات. " (دينيس روارت ، باريس ، 1950)

  • سيسلي بوست2
    (من اليسار): كلود مونيه (1887) / ألفريد سيسلي (1863)
  • سيسلي بوست3
    (من اليسار): موريت سور لوينغ، لا رو دي لوغليز (بطاقة بريدية عتيقة) / موريت سور لوينغ، ليغليز نورتي-دام (بطاقة بريدية عتيقة)
  • سيسلي بوست4
    (من اليسار): ألفريد سيسلي، "L'Église de Moret, le Soir, (The Church at Moret, The Evening)"، قديم على قماش / صورة اليوم الحالي ل Eglise Notre-Damer de la Nativite, Moret-sur-Loing

استقر ألفريد سيسلي في موريت سور لوينغ في نوفمبر 1889 ، وهي قرية ذات سحر لا مثيل له بين إيل دو فرانس وبورغندي على حافة غابة فونتينبلو. من بين ميزاتها الأكثر جاذبية كنيسة نورتي دام المهيبة ذات الطراز القوطي التي تهيمن على الأفق من النهر. من حديقة سيسلي المتواضعة ، كان برج الكنيسة سمة موجودة في كل مكان للأفق.

على عكس مونيه ، الذي تم تنفيذ مشاهده الثلاثين لرواق كاتدرائية روان على الجانب الغربي حصريا كفحص للعبة الضوء والظل عبر واجهة المبنى ، سعى سيسلي إلى تأكيد الطبيعة الدائمة للكنيسة في ظل التغيرات المتفاوتة للضوء والجو الذي تم التقاطه في لوحاته. من بين الانطباعيين ، كان أكثر تكريسا للعمل في الهواء الطلق دون التراجع إلى الاستوديو لإجراء تعديلات أو لمسات. عمل سيسلي الهادئ والخاص على كاتدرائياته كما كان دائما ، alla prima وحصريا في الهواء الطلق لإظهار المظهر المتغير للفكرة من خلال سلسلة من التغييرات الجوية. إن كونه أعطى عناوين الأعمال مثل "تحت أشعة الشمس" و "تحت الصقيع" و "تحت المطر" وعرضها كمجموعة في صالون دو شامب دو مارس في عام 1894 يشير إلى أنه فكر فيها أيضا كتفسيرات متسلسلة.

غالبا ما تم الاستشهاد بسيسلي لنزاهته اللطيفة وقدرته على تقديم صدق الجو والنغمة ، لكنه كان قادرا أيضا على إنتاج مؤلفات منظمة بقوة وبرع في تصوير المشاهد من زوايا غير عادية نشطت مؤلفاته. ليس من المستغرب أن يقدم L'Église de Moret, le Soir مثالا ممتازا على كيفية تعيين سيسلي لحامله إلى ميزة كبيرة. يميل خط نظره قليلا إلى الأعلى ، ولكنه موجه بالتأكيد إلى زاوية الرواق الجنوبي الغربي. تؤكد هذه الميزة العمودية المجمعة على التوجه التصاعدي المفرض لزخارف الكنيسة. لكن الفن الحقيقي هنا هو أنه يعمل كمركز تنسحب منه قوتان متوترتان بعيدا عن بعضهما البعض والمثير للدهشة ، بقوة متناسبة. إن تألق هذه اللوحة هو التأثير الدرامي لمنظور الغرق الذي أنشأه الشارع الضيق (rue de l'Église) على اليسار والمعارضة الصارخة يوفر بنية حجرية ذات وزن وكتلة لا يمكن تصورهما. كلاهما جوانب مستوية تظهر بشكل جميل وجهات نظر متناقصة من ثلاث نقاط تمت صياغتها بشكل مثالي.

من بين عشرات الزيوت المعروفة التي رسمها سيسلي للكنيسة في موريت ، L'Église de Moret ، فإن le Soir ليست فقط ذات حجم سخي ، بل هي أيضا من بين أكبر اللوحات في عمله بأكمله. يوضح حجم هذا العمل تصميم سيسلي على إنشاء تكريم يحترم تماما المهندسين المعماريين وبناة هيكل منيع وحازم للغاية ، لدرجة أنه وقف كما هو عندما رسمه سيسلي كما فعل خلال العصور الوسطى ، ويقف لنا اليوم ، لأنه سيستمر في سحيق. 

الاستفسار

تفاصيل الفن

العودة

ألفريد SISLEY & nbsp(1839-1899)

الفنان بيو الاستفسارحميل PDF
 
Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight.
Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing. Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight.
L'Église de Moret, le Soir189431 1/4 x 39 1/2 in. (81.28 × 100.33 سم) قماش زيتي
الاصل
سيسلي العقارية
بيع: Vente de l'Atelier Sisley, Galeries Georges Petit Paris, May 1, 1899, lot 13
جورج فياو، باريس
بيع: فندق دروت باريس، 20 فبراير 1908، قطعة 37
مجموعة بيرسون، باريس (تم الاستحواذ عليها في عملية البيع المذكورة أعلاه)
بيع: فينتي بيرسون، غاليري بول كاسيرير برلين، 18 أكتوبر 1927، قطعة 65
مجموعة خاصة
بيع: فندق دروت، باريس، 23 يونيو 1928، قطعة 98
مجموعة أوبيرت ، باريس (تم شراؤها في البيع أعلاه ؛ ربما مارسيل أوبيرت)
مجموعة خاصة إدوارد ناهيم غاليري
S... اكثر...تيفن بيدوفيتز ، بوكا راتون ، فلوريدا (تم الحصول عليها في عام 1989)
مجموعه خاصه ، نيويورك
لاري لاسيرت ، دالاس (تم الاستحواذ عليه في عام 1991)
مجموعة خاصة (تم الحصول عليها عام 1996)
معرض
طوكيو، متحف إيسيتان للفنون؛ كاغاوا، متحف تاكاماتسو البلدي للفنون؛ هيروشيما، متحف الفن وواكاياما، متحف إدارة الفن الحديث، معرض ألفريد سيسلي، 2000، العدد 53، مصور بالألوان الصفحات 138-139
الادب
O. Reuterswaerd, 'Sisley's Cathedrals, A Study of the Church at Moret' in Gazette des Beaux Arts, March 1952, fig. 1, illustrated p. 194
ف. دولتي، ألفريد سيسلي. Catalogue raisonné de l'œuvre peint, لوزان, 1959, No. 835, موضح بالأبيض والأسود
ف. دولتي، سيسلي. Les Saisons, Paris, 1992, No. 41, موضحة بالألوان ص 73
() R. Shone, Sisley, New York, 1992, pl. 134, موضح بالألوان ص 170 (مذكور الصفحات 164-165)
Brame، S.، Sisley، A.، Lorenceau، F.، & Daulte، O. (2021). ألفريد سيسلي: كتالوج نقد البينتورات والباستيل. ص 347 مريض. 347, 501
... اقل...
بين إيل دو فرانس وبورغوندي وعلى حافة غابة فونتينبلو تقع قرية موريت سور لوينغ التي تعود للقرون الوسطى، والتي أنشئت في القرن ال 12. عندما وصف ألفريد سيسلي شخصيتها لمونيه في رسالة مؤرخة في 31 أغسطس 1881 بأنها "منظر طبيعي لعلبة الشوكولاتة ..." كان يقصد ذلك كتذكار للإغراء. أن الاحتفاظ بها ، والأسوار ، والكنيسة ، والبوابات المحصنة ، والواجهات المزخرفة التي تقع على طول النهر كانت ، بالنسبة للرسام ، مكانا لا مثيل له. الكنيسة القديمة ، التي تعد دائما أكثر معالم المدينة لفتا للنظر على طول وادي السين ، ستكون حاضرة في مناظر مدينة سيسلي كما كانت بالنسبة لكوروت ومونيه في فيثيويل. ولكن على عكس مونيه الذي تم تنفيذ ثلاثين منظرا لكاتدرائية روان حتى يتمكن من تتبع مسرحية الضوء والظل عبر واجهة الكاتدرائية والتقاط الطبيعة سريعة الزوال للتغيرات لحظة بلحظة في الضوء والغلاف الجوي ، شرع سيسلي في تأكيد الطبيعة الدائمة لكنيسة نوتردام في موريت سور لوينج. كان اهتمام مونيه الوحيد هو الهواء والضوء ، ويبدو أن سيسلي تذكار تكريم. تنضح اللوحة باحترام المهندسين المعماريين والبنائين الأصليين لهيكل منيع وحازم للغاية ، فقد وقفت آنذاك كما كانت في تلك العصور الوسطى ، والتي بالنسبة لنا ، تقف اليوم ، كما ستفعل ، إلى زمن سحيق.

ومع ذلك ، سعى سيسلي لإظهار المظهر المتغير للفكرة من خلال سلسلة من التغيرات الجوية. أعطى عناوين الأعمال مثل "في الشمس المشرقة" و "تحت الصقيع" و "تحت المطر" وعرضها كمجموعة في صالون دو شامب دي مارس في عام 1894 ، وهي عوامل تشير إلى أنه فكر فيها كتفسيرات متسلسلة. ومع ذلك ، على عكس عمل مونيه ، l'église de Moret ، يكشف Le Soir أن سيسلي اختار عرض الفكرة في سياق مكاني يبرز سماتها التركيبية - المنظور الهابط للشارع الضيق على اليسار ، والركود القطري القوي لخطوط البناء كموازنة لليمين ، والوزن المهيب للمبنى الحجري فوق خط الرؤية.
العودة
الاستفسار

قراءة إضافية

فريزيكي ومونيه

اكتشف الحوار بين الانطباعيين الفرنسيين والأمريكيين من خلال "Hill at Giverny" لفريدريك فريزيكي ...

أنسل آدمز: تأكيد الحياة

تقدم هيذر جيمس فحصا حميميا لصور أنسل آدامز....

كلود مونيه الأعمال المباعة مؤخرا

مونيه وأعماله هي تخصص بالنسبة لنا في هيذر جيمس للفنون الجميلة ، بعد أن باع العشرات من لوحاته على ...

سوق الفن مارس 2023

يناقش جيم كارونا المؤسس المشارك لشركة هيذر جيمس للفنون الجميلة مرونة سوق الفن ويقدم رؤى حول الاستثمار في...

مرونة سوق الفن

يستعرض جيم كارونا المؤسس المشارك لشركة هيذر جيمس للفنون الجميلة أداء سوق الفن خلال فترة الركود السابقة ...

الفن كاستثمار

تم إدراج الفنون الجميلة من بين أفضل الرهانات لعام 2022. اطلع على تحليلنا المتعمق للفن كأصل في ...

ريتشارد برنس ورعاة البقر

دفعت سلسلة ريتشارد برينس بدون عنوان (رعاة البقر) حدود التأليف والأصالة ، التي تركز على رمز ...

اكتشف فن البوب - وارهول إلى ثيبو

استفاد فن البوب من وسائل الإعلام المتنوعة ومراجع الثقافة الشعبية كتعليق على وسائل الإعلام الجماهيرية والإنتاج الضخم و ...

مارسدن هارتلي – الحداثة الأمريكية

من بين أوائل الرسامين الحداثيين الأمريكيين العظماء ، اعتنق مارسدن هارتلي التجريد واستلهم من ...

لوحات المناظر الطبيعية من قبل يان فان غوين وسالومون فان رويسدايل

من بين أشهر رسامي المناظر الطبيعية وأكثرهم شهرة في العصر الذهبي الهولندي جان فان غوين وسالومون فان ...