Peintures de cathédrales d'Alfred Sisley et de Claude Monet

 

"Après une matinée pluvieuse, la journée est devenue ensoleillée, et nous sommes allés à Moret... Nous avons vu Sisley." - Julie Manet, 1893
  • Sisley-post1
    Claude Monet, série cathédrale de Rouen
  • Regardez la vidéo "time-lapse" du Getty Museum qui suit la progression du soleil dans la série de tableaux de Monet.

La série des cathédrales de Rouen de Monet compte parmi les réalisations les plus célèbres de l'histoire de l'art. Plus de trois ans après sa création au début du mois de février 1892, vingt des trente toiles de Monet représentant des cathédrales ont été exposées à la galerie Durand-Ruel, et l'exposition a été considérée comme un triomphe par tous ceux qui y ont assisté en mai 1895. Parmi les peintres, Camille Pissarro a écrit qu'il "était transporté par leur extraordinaire habileté". Cezanne, que [Pissarro] a rencontré hier chez Durand-Ruel, est tout à fait d'accord... c'est l'œuvre d'un artiste équilibré mais impulsif qui poursuit les nuances intangibles des effets réalisés par aucun autre peintre." (Camille Pissarro à son fils, Lucien, 26 mai 1895)

Cependant, Monet n'était pas aussi confiant lorsqu'il a poursuivi cette entreprise en avril 1892. Connu pour ses sautes d'humeur habituelles, Monet est retourné à Giverny avec le premier lot de toiles de cathédrales et craignait que le fait de pousser la lumière et son effet sur les formes au-delà de toutes les prévisions précédentes ne soit un excès. Mais lorsqu'il a dévoilé les tableaux aux visiteurs, ceux-ci ont réagi avec un étonnement stupéfiant, et la confiance de Monet s'est accrue. L'éloge effusif du peintre américain Theodore Robinson correspond à la réaction stupéfaite que d'autres ont éprouvée en voyant ces chefs-d'œuvre : "Ils sont tout simplement colossaux. Jamais, je crois, une architecture n'a été peinte de la sorte, l'impression la plus étonnante de la chose, un sentiment de grandeur et de décadence... pas une ligne nulle part - et pourtant il y a une merveilleuse impression de construction et de solidité. N'est-ce pas curieux, un homme qui prend un tel matériau et en fait un usage aussi magnifique ?" (Robinson à J. Alden Weir, mai 1892)

Alfred Sisley aurait-il pu faire partie des premiers intervenants de la cathédrale? Certainement. Monet et lui étaient les amis les plus proches. Si Sisley était un homme discret et privé qui a laissé peu de traces biographiques, il était également une ressource de grande confiance et un artiste que Monet respectait énormément. En fait, des témoignages de première main de Sisley et des cohortes de Monet confirment le lien entre les deux séries. Le 21 septembre 1893, Julie Manet (alors adolescente, fille de Berthe Morisot et d'Eugène, le frère d'Edouard Manet) écrit dans son journal : "Après une matinée pluvieuse, le jour s'est éclairci et nous sommes allés à Moret... Nous avons vu Sisley". Son fils, l'historien de l'art Denis Rouart, a confirmé l'inscription en précisant que "Berthe et sa fille... sont allées avec les Mallarmé à Moret où Sisley peignait une série d'églises - inspirée, du moins Mallarmé le pensait-il, par la série des Cathédrales de Monet". (Denis Rouart, Paris, 1950)

  • Sisley-post2
    (de gauche à droite) : Claude Monet (1887) / Alfred Sisley (1863)
  • Sisley-post3
    (de gauche à droite) : Moret sur Loing, La rue de l'Eglise (carte postale ancienne) / Moret sur Loing, l'eglise Norte-Dame (carte postale ancienne)
  • Sisley-post4
    (de gauche à droite) : Alfred Sisley, "L'Église de Moret, le Soir", ancien sur toile / Photo actuelle de l'Église Notre-Damer de la Nativite, Moret-sur-Loing

Alfred Sisley s'était installé à Moret-sur-Loing en novembre 1889, un village au charme inégalé entre l'île-de-France et la Bourgogne, à la lisière de la forêt de Fontainebleau. Parmi ses plus beaux atouts, l'imposante église de la Norte-Dame, de style gothique, domine l'horizon depuis la rivière. Depuis le modeste jardin de Sisley, le clocher de l'église était un élément omniprésent de la ligne d'horizon.

Contrairement à Monet, dont les trente vues du portique ouest de la cathédrale de Rouen ont été exécutées exclusivement dans le but d'examiner les jeux d'ombre et de lumière sur la façade de l'édifice, Sisley a cherché à affirmer la nature permanente de l'église sous les changements variables de lumière et d'atmosphère capturés dans ses tableaux. Parmi les impressionnistes, c'est lui qui s'est le plus consacré au travail en plein air, sans se retirer dans un studio pour des modifications ou des retouches. Le calme et l'intimité de Sisley lui ont permis de travailler sur ses cathédrales comme il l'a toujours fait, alla prima et exclusivement en plein air pour montrer l'apparence changeante d'un motif à travers une série de changements atmosphériques. Le fait qu'il ait donné à ses œuvres des titres tels que "Sous le soleil", "Sous le givre" et "Sous la pluie" et qu'il les ait exposées en groupe au Salon du Champ-de-Mars en 1894 suggère qu'il les considérait également comme des interprétations en série.

Sisley était souvent cité pour sa douce intégrité et sa capacité à rendre la vérité de l'atmosphère et du ton, mais il était également capable de produire des compositions puissamment structurées et excellait dans la représentation de scènes sous des angles inhabituels qui dynamisaient ses compositions. Il n'est pas surprenant que L'Église de Moret, le Soir fournisse un excellent exemple de la façon dont Sisley a réglé son chevalet de manière très avantageuse. Sa ligne de vue est légèrement inclinée vers le haut, mais résolument dirigée vers l'angle sud-ouest du portique. Ce faisceau de colonnes souligne la poussée imposante et ascendante du motif de l'église. Mais le véritable art ici est qu'il fonctionne comme le centre à partir duquel deux forces de tension s'éloignent l'une de l'autre et, étonnamment, avec une force proportionnelle. L'éclat de ce tableau réside dans l'effet dramatique d'une perspective plongeante créée par la rue étroite (rue de l'Église) à gauche et l'opposition floue fournit une structure en pierre d'un poids et d'une masse inimaginables ; ces deux aspects sont des aspects planaires qui démontrent magnifiquement des perspectives décroissantes en trois points parfaitement dessinées.

Parmi la douzaine d'huiles connues que Sisley a peintes de l'église de Moret, L'Église de Moret, le Soir n'est pas seulement d'une taille généreuse, elle figure également parmi les plus grandes peintures de toute son œuvre. L'échelle de cette œuvre démontre la détermination de Sisley à créer un hommage qui respecte pleinement les architectes et les bâtisseurs d'une structure si imprenable et si résolue, qu'elle était la même lorsque Sisley l'a peinte qu'à l'époque médiévale, et qu'elle est pour nous aujourd'hui, comme elle le sera pour toujours. 

demander

Détail de l'art

Précédent

ALFRED SISLEY (1839-1899)

 
Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight. Between Île-de-France and Burgundy and on the edge of the Fontainebleau Forest lies the medieval village of Moret-sur-Loing, established in the 12th century. When Alfred Sisley described its character to Monet in a letter dated 31 August 1881 as “a chocolate-box landscape…” he meant it as a memento of enticement; that its keep, the ramparts, the church, the fortified gates, and the ornate facades nestled along the river were, for a painter, a setting of unmatched charm. An ancient church, always the most striking townscape feature along the Seine Valley, would be a presence in Sisley’s townscape views as it was for Corot, and for Monet at Vétheuil. But unlike Monet whose thirty views of Rouen Cathedral were executed so he could trace the play of light and shadow across the cathedral façade and capture the ephemeral nature of moment-to-moment changes of light and atmosphere, Sisley set out to affirm the permanent nature of the church of Notre-Dame at Moret-sur-Loing.  Monet’s sole concern was air and light, and Sisley’s appears to be an homage keepsake. The painting exudes respect for the original architects and builders of a structure so impregnable and resolute, it stood then as it did in those medieval times, and which for us, stands today, as it will, for time immemorial.<br><br>Nevertheless, Sisley strived to show the changing appearance of the motif through a series of atmospheric changes. He gave the works titles such as “In Sunshine”, “Under Frost”, and “In Rain” and exhibited them as a group at the Salon du Champ-de-Mars in 1894, factors that suggest he thought of them as serial interpretations. Nevertheless, unlike Monet’s work, l’église de Moret, le Soir reveals that Sisley chose to display the motif within a spatial context that accentuates its compositional attributes — the plunging perspective of the narrow street at left, the strong diagonal recession of the building lines as a counterbalance to the right, and the imposing weight of the stony building above the line of sight.
L'Église de Moret, le Soir189431 1/4 x 39 1/2 po.(81,28 x 100,33 cm) huile sur toile
Provenance
Domaine Sisley
Vente : Vente de l'Atelier Sisley, Galeries Georges Petit Paris, 1er mai 1899, lot 13
George Viau, Paris
Vente : Hôtel Drouot Paris, 20 février 1908, lot 37
Collection Pearson, Paris (acquise lors de la vente ci-dessus)
Vente : Vente Pearson, Galerie Paul Cassirer Berlin, 18 octobre 1927, lot 65
Collection privée
Vente : Hôtel Drouot, Paris, 23 juin 1928, lot 98
Collection Aubert, Paris (acheté à la vente ci-dessus ; peut-être Marcel Aubert)
Collection privée Galerie Edward Nahem
S
...Plus.....teven Bedowitz, Boca Raton, Floride (acquis en 1989)
Collection particulière, New York
Larry Lacerte, Dallas (acquis en 1991)
Collection privée (acquise en 1996)
Exposition
Tokyo, Isetan Museum of Art ; Kagawa, Takamatsu Municipal Museum of Art ; Hiroshima, Museum of Art et Wakayama, Departmental Museum of Modern Art, Exposition Alfred Sisley, 2000, no. 53, illustré en couleur pp. 138-139
Littérature
O. Reuterswaerd, 'Sisley's Cathedrals, A Study of the Church at Moret' in Gazette des Beaux Arts, March 1952, fig. 1, illustré p. 194.
F. Daulte, Alfred Sisley. Catalogue raisonné de l'œuvre peint, Lausanne, 1959, n° 835, illustré en noir et blanc.
F. Daulte, Sisley. Les Saisons, Paris, 1992, no. 41, illustré en couleur p. 73
R. Shone, Sisley, New York, 1992, pl. 134, illustré en couleur p. 170 (mentionné pp. 164-165)
Brame, S., Sisley, A., Lorenceau, F., & Daulte, O. (2021). Alfred Sisley : Catalogue critique des peintures et des pastels. P. 347 ill. 347, 501
...MOINS.....
Entre l'Île-de-France et la Bourgogne, à l'orée de la forêt de Fontainebleau, se trouve le village médiéval de Moret-sur-Loing, fondé au XIIe siècle. Lorsqu'Alfred Sisley décrit à Monet, dans une lettre du 31 août 1881, son caractère de "paysage de boîte de chocolat...", il s'agit pour lui d'un souvenir de séduction : son donjon, ses remparts, son église, ses portes fortifiées, ses façades ornées nichées le long de la rivière constituent, pour un peintre, un cadre d'un charme inégalé. Une ancienne église, toujours l'élément le plus frappant du paysage urbain le long de la vallée de la Seine, sera présente dans les vues de Sisley comme elle l'était pour Corot, et pour Monet à Vétheuil. Mais contrairement à Monet, dont les trente vues de la cathédrale de Rouen ont été exécutées afin qu'il puisse retracer les jeux d'ombre et de lumière sur la façade de la cathédrale et capturer la nature éphémère des changements de lumière et d'atmosphère d'un moment à l'autre, Sisley a cherché à affirmer la nature permanente de l'église Notre-Dame de Moret-sur-Loing. La seule préoccupation de Monet était l'air et la lumière, et celle de Sisley apparaît comme un souvenir d'hommage. Le tableau respire le respect pour les architectes et les constructeurs d'origine d'une structure si imprenable et si résolue qu'elle se dressait alors comme à l'époque médiévale et qui, pour nous, se dresse aujourd'hui comme elle se dressera à jamais.

Néanmoins, Sisley s'est efforcé de montrer l'aspect changeant du motif à travers une série de changements atmosphériques. Il a donné à ses œuvres des titres tels que "Au soleil", "Sous le givre" et "Sous la pluie" et les a exposées en tant que groupe au Salon du Champ-de-Mars en 1894, des facteurs qui suggèrent qu'il les considérait comme des interprétations en série. Néanmoins, contrairement à l'œuvre de Monet, l'église de Moret, le Soir révèle que Sisley a choisi de présenter le motif dans un contexte spatial qui accentue ses attributs compositionnels - la perspective plongeante de la rue étroite à gauche, la forte récession diagonale des lignes de construction comme contrepoids à droite, et le poids imposant du bâtiment en pierre au-dessus de la ligne de vue.
demander

Lectures complémentaires